Search Results for "basic amenities condition"

177 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 177 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act but Reduces Damages — LIC vs NIC Dispute Over Flat Occupancy. The court held that the Appellate Authority's reduction of damages and stay on execution pending High Power Committee decision was justified, but eviction order was valid.

The dispute involves two public sector undertakings: Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), the owner of a flat, and National Insurance Company Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Evidence. Externment Order Under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Found Legally Unsustainable as Based on Vague Allegations and Pending Criminal Cases Challenged as Malicious.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, which dismissed a criminal writ petition challenging an externment orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Requirement. Alleged Caste-Based Insult in Private Setting Not Attracting Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, 22 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal for Enhancement of Land Acquisition Compensation — Appellants Failed to Prove Market Value. Land Acquisition Officer's Award of Rs.23 per sq m Upheld Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, Shivanand Vassudeva Salgaocar and Dattaraj Vassudeva Salgaocar, owned land surveyed under no.219/2 in Village Sancoale, admeasuring 52...