Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Extension of Time for Filing Written Statement Beyond 120 Days Under Amended CPC. Mandatory Forfeiture of Right to File Written Statement After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC as Amended by Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against two orders of the High Court that permitted the defendant to file a written statement beyond the statutory...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Enquiry Officer's Report Not Furnished to Contractor Before Imposing Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by Respondent No.2, Oil and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal under Section 91 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 against Registrar's order permitting delayed evidence affidavit

The Bombay High Court heard an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 against an order of the Registrar of Trade Marks allowing a delaye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal Order in Commercial Suit — Suit Not Barred by Arbitration Clause as Reliefs Are Not Covered by Arbitration Agreement.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants/defendants challenging the order dated 03.02.2023 passed by the Commercial Court at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Internal Enquiry Report Not Shared With Contractor Before Imposing Business Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by respondent No.2, Oil and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Overrules Res Judicata Objection in Admiralty Limitation Suit; Prior Withdrawal of Application Before Chinese Court Does Not Bar Fresh Suit Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a voyage of the vessel M.V. YURIY ARSHENEVSKIY, owned by Murmansk Shipping Company, a Russian entity, which was chartered to ca...