Search Results for "agriculturists"

383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Due to Court Closure During Limitation Period — Condonation of Delay Granted. The period of court closure during winter vacation is excluded for computing limitation under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, aggrieved by an arbitral award dated 24.08.2016, sought to challenge it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order on Withdrawal of Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Appellant Acquiring Body Directed to Deposit 100% Enhanced Compensation; Claimants Permitted to Withdraw 25% Without Security, Balance 75% to be Invested in Fixed Deposit.

The case arises from a land acquisition in 1996 where the Reference Court enhanced compensation after about 17 years. The acquiring body, Nayara Energ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Validly Taken Under Section 10(5) of ULC Act Before Repeal. Application Under Section 21 Was Barred by Limitation, and Repeal Did Not Affect Lands Where Possession Was Already Taken.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The appellants, legal representatives...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Appeals Due to Inordinate Delay of 21 Years. Petitioners Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay, Special Leave Petitions Dismissed as Barred by Limitation.

The case involves special leave petitions filed by original claimants (landowners) challenging a common judgment dated 2.4.1996 of the Allahabad High ...