Search Results for "Sharad Sarda Case"

443 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 443 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence in Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl - Accused's Appeal Dismissed. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and medical evidence held sufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 364, 366, 376, 377, 302, 201 IPC.

The case pertains to the kidnapping, rape, and murder of an 11-year-old girl named Bhagyashree on 10.11.2004. The accused, Arjun Laxman Jogadiya alias...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Failure to Explain Under Section 106 Evidence Act Confirm Guilt Under Sections 366A, 376(2)(f), 302 IPC.

The appellant, Vijay Babasaheb Nanavare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 88 of 2006 for kidnapping a minor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Based on Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Fails as Circumstantial Evidence Does Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt Under Sections 302 and 392 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Radhe Zulidas Mandal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No. 34 of 2012 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Double Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Complete and Accused Failed to Explain Incriminating Facts Under Section 313 CrPC.

The appellant, Rajesab Mujawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji in Sessions Case No. 20/2008 for the murder of Shekappa Bhandar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Dying Declaration and Recovery from Accused form key evidence in determining guilt under Section 302 IPC.

The appeal arose from the conviction of Basavaraj Jagaluru for the murder of Jagadish Shiraguppi, a blind man from Gadag. On 23 May 2015, Police Inspe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Suspicion Cannot Substitute Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Chain of Circumstances Incomplete and Key Witnesses Turned Hostile.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Ram Pratap, who was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder of Pregnant Wife in Dowry-Related Killing. Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, But Conviction Under Section 316 IPC Set Aside for Lack of Proof of Quickening.

The appellant, Sudarshan Narayan Mengade, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Pune for the murder of his wife Sheetal and for causing the death of he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Filed by Accused Convicted Under IPC Sections 364, 302, 201 for Kidnapping and Murder. The Court Examines Whether the Trial Court's Life Imprisonment Sentence Is Sustainable Based on Evidence.

The criminal appeal preferred by the accused-appellant challenged the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.12.2017 passed by the I Ad...