Search Results for "Seized articles"

2626 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2626 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 394 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole testimony of child witness was not corroborated and identification parade was not conducted properly.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal against the conviction of the appellant-accused for offences under Sections 302, 392, 394 read with 34 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Chudaman s/o Gambhirdas Shahu, was convicted by the 6th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.553/2000 for the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad Case Under UAP Act. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 and Entitles Accused to Bail Despite Section 43D(5) Bar.

The appellant, Hany Babu, a professor and academic, was arrested on 28 July 2020 in connection with FIR No. 1 of 2020 registered by the National Inves...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last seen theory and recovery of stolen articles establish guilt under Sections 302, 392, 452 IPC.

The appellant, Nareshkumar Rajpal Bagdi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane for the murder of Shrimati Shraddha Pardeshi and for ro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Anant Chandru Wake, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on 30/7/1994 for the murder of Mangesh Sawant, a Fores...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gopalrao Dnyanobaji Borkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Amravati on 29/04/2019 in Sessions Case No.178/2016 for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Weak Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence.

The appellant, Jamsing Hulya Barela, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Khetalibai and sentenced to life...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC in Circumstantial Murder Case. Court Rejects Objection to Composite Charge but Leaves Other Issues Open for Determination.

The appellant, Abdul Hannan Abdulhai Kadri, challenged his conviction under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code by the Adhoc Additional Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 201, 324, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 6, were convicted by the Ist Ad hoc Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, on 8.5.2007 in Sessions Case No.102 of 2006...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Conspiracy Case Under IPC Sections 120B and 302 Read with 34 Due to Insufficient Evidence and Inconsistencies. Appeals Allowed Setting Aside Trial Court Conviction

The High Court of Karnataka allowed criminal appeals filed by five accused persons, acquitting them of charges under Section 120B of IPC for conspirac...