Search Results for "Section 281"

376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Order for Not Giving Effect to ITAT Directions — Refund of Rs. 40,06,299/- Ordered. The impugned order failed to correctly implement the ITAT's order and erroneously computed tax liability, leading to a direction for fresh computation and refund.

The petitioner, Ayyappa Seva Samgham Bombay, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlords' Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case Due to Insufficient Evidence of Danger to Tenanted Portions. Eviction Decrees Set Aside as Municipal Demolition Notice and Other Grounds Under Sections 15 and 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Were Not Satisfactorily Proven.

The dispute involved landlords appealing against a Bombay High Court judgment that invalidated eviction decrees against two tenants under the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Same Material Considered in Original Scrutiny Assessment is Invalid.

The petitioner, Clear Media (India) Private Limited, a company engaged in FM Radio Broadcasting, filed its return of income for the assessment year 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment and Stay Rejection in Income Tax Case — Violation of Natural Justice and CBDT Circular. Petitioner's Bank Accounts Attached Without Prior Hearing; Court Directs Restoration of Status Quo Pending Appeal.

The petitioner, Milestone Real Estate Fund, a real estate fund, challenged the provisional attachment of its assets under Section 281B of the Income T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition in Maintenance Execution Case — Offer to Maintain After Final Order Not Permissible. Second Proviso to Section 125(3) CrPC Cannot Be Invoked After Final Maintenance Order Under Section 125(1) CrPC.

The petitioner, Shivaji Tukaram Davargave, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the orders of the Magistrate and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India's Restructuring and Transfer of Employees to Subsidiaries. Transfer of employees to wholly owned subsidiaries held not to be closure or retrenchment under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by various trade unions and associations of employees of Air India Limited challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer of Employees from Municipal Corporation to State Government. Transfer of employees under Section 451 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 held valid as in public interest and for better administration.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) challenging their transfer to the Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 138 NI Act and Directs Magistrates to Accept Complaints Without Preliminary Inquiry. Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is constitutionally valid and Section 200 CrPC does not require preliminary inquiry in cheque dishonour cases.

The judgment arises from a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the p...