Search Results for "Section 163-A"

182 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Permanent Disability and Loss of Income. The court enhanced compensation from Rs.1,10,000 to Rs.5,14,735 for injuries sustained in a head-on collision between a bus and a truck.

The appellant, Ranjit Arunkumar Jaiswal, was a 29-year-old businessman running a Funfair and Mini Bazar. On 15/11/1997, he was travelling in a luxury ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Truck Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Proved. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation with 6% interest per annum from date of petition.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli, dated 28 September 2005 in Claim Petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Single-Vehicle Accident Case. Legal Heirs of Driver-Brother Entitled to Compensation Under Comprehensive Policy Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal by United India Assurance Company Ltd. against an award of compensation to the legal heirs of Bhaskar Patki, who died in a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Incorrect Multiplier and Omission of Future Prospects. Multiplier of 16 Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Deceased Aged 35 Years.

The appeal was filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Chintaman Kolekar, who died in a motor vehicle accident involving a motorcycle and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of a 19-Year-Old Student. Court holds that future prospects must be considered even for non-earning deceased, and multiplier should be based on age of deceased, not claimant.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the appellants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased, a 19-year-old student named Pra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Proved. Deceased Motorcyclist's Contributory Negligence Not Established; Compensation of Rs. 2,50,000 Upheld Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) against the judgment and award dated 17/8/2004 passed by the Motor Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Appellant Not Liable as Deceased Was Not His Employee. Employer-Employee Relationship Not Established Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of deceased Vitthal Korde, who died in a road accident on 21/1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim - Compensation Enhanced for Death of Labourer Due to Wrong Multiplier. Multiplier of 18 applied instead of 12 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for deceased aged 24 years earning Rs.1400 per month.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the wife, minor children, and parents of deceased Kacharu Rathod, challenging the inadequacy of compensation aw...