Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation for Minor's Death in Motor Accident — Applies Multiplier of 15 Instead of 18. The court held that for a non-earning minor, the multiplier should be 15 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, reducing the award from Rs.35,92,000/- to Rs.2,62,500/-.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 90
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Smt. Rajashri Pramanik Sable, mother of the deceased minor Neil Pramanik Sable, who died in a road accident on 8th November 2019. The deceased, aged 10 years, was riding pillion on a motorcycle when a truck dashed it from behind, causing fatal injuries. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Mumbai, awarded compensation of Rs.35,92,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum. The insurance company, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., appealed against the award, primarily challenging the multiplier of 18 applied by the Tribunal. The High Court examined the facts and legal principles. It noted that the deceased was a minor with no income, and as per the settled law in Sarla Verma v. DTC, the appropriate multiplier for a minor is 15, not 18. The court recalculated the compensation: notional income of Rs.15,000/- per annum (as per Second Schedule), multiplier of 15, and deduction of 50% for personal expenses, resulting in Rs.1,12,500/- for loss of dependency. Adding Rs.1,00,000/- for loss of love and affection, Rs.35,000/- for funeral expenses, and Rs.15,000/- for loss of estate, the total compensation was reduced to Rs.2,62,500/-. The court also upheld the Tribunal's finding of no contributory negligence and maintained the interest rate of 7.5% per annum. The appeal was partly allowed, reducing the compensation from Rs.35,92,000/- to Rs.2,62,500/-.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Minor Deceased - Multiplier - The Tribunal applied multiplier of 18 for a 10-year-old deceased minor, but the High Court held that for a non-earning minor, the appropriate multiplier is 15 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121. The court reduced the compensation accordingly. (Paras 1-13)

B) Motor Accident Claims - Contributory Negligence - The accident occurred when the motorcycle was dashed from behind by a truck; no contributory negligence was attributed to the deceased minor. The Tribunal's finding of no contributory negligence was upheld. (Paras 2-5)

C) Motor Accident Claims - Interest Rate - The Tribunal awarded interest at 7.5% per annum; the High Court did not interfere with the rate of interest. (Para 13)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal erred in applying a multiplier of 18 and awarding compensation of Rs.35,92,000/- for the death of a minor child, and whether the compensation should be reduced.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The impugned judgment and award is modified. The compensation is reduced from Rs.35,92,000/- to Rs.2,62,500/-. The rate of interest at 7.5% per annum is maintained. The appellant is directed to deposit the reduced amount with accrued interest within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Compensation for Minor Deceased
  • Multiplier for Non-Earning Minor
  • Sarla Verma v. DTC
  • Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Contributory Negligence
  • Interest Rate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-AS:53245

First Appeal No.1660 of 2025

2025-12-02

Aarti Sathye

2025:BHC-AS:53245

Ms. Kalpana Trivedi with Ms. Rajlaxmi Shettigar for Appellant; Mr. Bharat Gadhavi for Respondent No.1

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Smt. Rajashri Pramanik Sable and Mr. Vijay Kumar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation for death of a minor in a motor vehicle accident.

Remedy Sought

The appellant insurance company sought reduction of the compensation amount awarded by the Tribunal.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the multiplier of 18 applied by the Tribunal and the quantum of compensation.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, awarded Rs.35,92,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum to the claimant (respondent no.1).

Issues

Whether the multiplier of 18 applied by the Tribunal for a 10-year-old deceased minor is correct? What is the appropriate compensation for the death of a minor child in a motor accident?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the multiplier should be 15 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, and the compensation is excessive. Respondent no.1 supported the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

For a non-earning minor deceased, the appropriate multiplier is 15 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, and not 18. The notional income is taken as Rs.15,000/- per annum as per the Second Schedule. After deducting 50% for personal expenses, the loss of dependency is calculated as Rs.1,12,500/-. Additional amounts for loss of love and affection, funeral expenses, and loss of estate are added, totaling Rs.2,62,500/-.

Judgment Excerpts

This Appeal challenges the judgment and award dated 11th December 2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai whereby the applicant has been awarded an amount of Rs.35,92,000/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum. For a non-earning minor, the appropriate multiplier is 15 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC.

Procedural History

The claimant filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai. The Tribunal passed an award on 11th December 2024. The insurance company filed the present appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on an unspecified date. The appeal was heard and decided on 2nd December 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation for Minor's Death in Motor Accident — Applies Multiplier of 15 Instead of 18. The court held that for a non-earning minor, the multiplier should be 15 as per Sarla Ver...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeals Against Grant-in-Aid Claims Under Repealed 1994 Order. Employees of Non-Government Educational Institutions Entitled to Grant-in-Aid Despite Repeal of Orissa (Non Government Colleges, Junior Colleges and Higher S...