Search Results for "Rule 4"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant in Eviction Suit Due to Misuse of Adjournments and Failure to Cross-Examine. Closure of Cross-Examination Right Upheld as Defendant Sought Repeated Adjournments Despite Last Opportunities and Costs, Violating Procedural Cooperation Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Supreme Court dealt with a special leave petition challenging orders that closed the defendant's right to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Title Dispute Due to Failure to Establish Title and Upholds High Court's Evidence Appreciation. Appeal Maintained Despite Death of Defendant as Legal Representative Was Already on Record Under Order XLI Rule 4 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute originated from a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession filed by P. Ishwari Bai (first plaintiff) and her husband Narso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Promotion Case Under Bhakra Beas Management Board Regulations. Promotion Annulled by High Court Reversed as Appreciation Certificate Not Mandatory Under Seniority-cum-Merit Principle in Regulations 4(5) and 5.

The dispute arose from the promotion of appellants to the post of Leading Fireman under the Bhakra Beas Management Board Regulations, 1994. The appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Seniority Dispute, Overturning High Court Reliance on Per Incuriam Precedent. Seniority of Assistant Engineers Must Be Counted from Date of Regularization Under Uttar Pradesh Regularisation Rules, 1979 and 1989 Rules, Not from Initial Ad Hoc Appointments.

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a group of appeals concerning the seniority determination of Assistant Engine...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Lack of Financial Creditor Status. Interest-Free Term Loan Does Not Qualify as Financial Debt Under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as It Lacks Consideration for Time Value of Money.

The appeal arose under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against the dismissal by the National Company Law Appellate Tribun...