Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

919 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 919 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. The court held that the detaining authority must ensure grounds are communicated in a language known to the detenu to enable effective representation, and failure to do so renders the detention order invalid.

28 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Firoz Hyder Shaikh @ Kalya Firoz, was detained under a preventive detention order dated 5th September 2011 passed by the Commissioner ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

17 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Against Detenu in Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act Case — Detention Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material. Court Held That the Subjective Satisfaction of the Detaining Authority Must Be Based on Relevant Material and That the Failure to Consider the Detenu's Bail Application and the Fact That He Was Already in Custody Vitiated the Detention Order.

15 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Aman @ Amaan Jamir Shaikh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation — Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated. The court held that a delay of 21 days in deciding the detenu's representation without satisfactory explanation renders the detention illegal.

17 Feb 2015

The petitioner, mother of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Acti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Consideration of Bail Orders. Detaining Authority's Failure to Interact with Witnesses and Consider Bail Orders Renders Detention Invalid.

28 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Suraj @ Lalla Kalicharan Thakur, through his father, challenged the legality of a detention order dated 20/10/2022 passed by the Distr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority passed order within two days of receiving 287-page material, indicating lack of proper application of mind, and there was unexplained delay of 10 months from the first offence.

27 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Salauddin Imamuddin Ansari, father of the detenu Javed @ Sajan Salauddin Ansari, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Article 22(5). The court held that failure to communicate grounds of detention in a language understood by the detenu renders the detention illegal.

29 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Yashoda, wife of the detenu Keshava Poojary @ Choni, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Support Apprehension of Bail. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application; Detaining Authority's Satisfaction of Imminent Release Held Unsubstantiated.

14 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Sagar Sunil Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 27 September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Retraction of Statement and Bail Conditions Ignored, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

3 Jul 2015

The petitioner, son of the detenu Bittu Choith Harchandani, challenged a detention order dated 16.4.2015 passed by the second respondent under Section...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Obligation of State Government to Consider Detenu's Representation Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention Cases. Question of Whether Article 22(5) Mandates Separate Consideration by Government Before Referral to Advisory Board Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950.

31 Jan 1969

The case involved writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution filed by Abdul Karim and Others against the State of West Bengal challenging the...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)