Search Results for "Pay Commission arrears"

515 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 515 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Recovery of Excess Salary from Employees Without Hearing. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without opportunity of hearing and at fag-end of service is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, employees of the respondent-Corporation, were promoted and granted stepping up of pay in 1996. In 2012, the Corporation sought to rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal Order on Pay Protection for Regularized Employees. Pay Fixation Directed Afresh with Protection of Last Pay Drawn, but Seniority and Other Benefits Denied.

The petitioners, Anil D. Kagathara and another, were initially engaged as casual labourers with the respondent department and were later regularized. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Pay Protection in Regularization Case — Tribunal's Order Modified to Protect Last Pay Drawn. Pay Fixation Must Consider Last Pay Drawn Before Regularization Under Service Law Principles.

The petitioners, originally engaged as casual labourers in the Department of Posts, were regularized in service. They filed Original Application No.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Tribunal Order Quashing Employee's Termination in Service Misconduct Case. Termination Vitiated Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence Under Gujarat State Service Rules, with Employee Granted Pensionary Benefits but Denied Full Back Wages.

The dispute arose from the termination of a state government employee, who served as a Senior Clerk, on charges of corruption related to underpayment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Employees' Claim for 5th Pay Commission Benefits Under Voluntary Retirement Scheme. Court Holds Scheme Was Incentive for Voluntary Retirement, Not a General Pay Revision, Hence Not Applicable to Those Already Retired.

The petitioners, two former employees of Maharashtra State Oil Seeds Commercial & Industrial Corporation Ltd. (MOSICOL), retired on attaining the age ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Kerosene Dealers' Association Challenging Inclusion of VAT in Ceiling Price. State's Power to Fix Maximum Price Including Taxes Upheld Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The petitioners, Mumbai Kerosene Dealers' Association and its members, who are wholesale kerosene dealers holding licences under the Maharashtra Keros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge to Sale of Captive Power to Third Party Without Licence Under Electricity Act, 2003. Captive Generating Plant Not Required to Obtain Licence for Sale to Another Industrial Consumer Under Section 9 Read With Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulator...