Search Results for "NDPS Act"

471 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 471 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Owner in NDPS Case for Lack of Knowledge of Contraband Transport. Section 25 NDPS Act Requires Proof That Owner Knowingly Permitted Use of Vehicle for Drug Offence.

The appellant, Harbhajan Singh, was convicted under Section 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Trial Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Procedural Non-Compliance in Private Vehicle Search. Conviction Quashed as Search Governed by Section 42, Not Section 43, of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, with Mandatory Requirements Not Met.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, where the appellants were found with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Search Conducted Without Magistrate or Gazetted Officer. Non-compliance with mandatory provision of Section 50 of NDPS Act renders conviction unsustainable.

The appellant, Chidi Oscita Okonkowa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji, in Special Criminal Case No. 41/2014 (NDPS) for possessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Despite Subsequent Filing of Chargesheet. Indefeasible Right Accrues on Expiry of Statutory Period and Filing of Bail Application Before Chargesheet.

The appellant, M. Ravindran, was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.08.2018 for offences under the NDPS Act. Under Section 36A(4) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Search of Accused Without Informing Them of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Recovery Illegal.

The case involves four appeals filed by Abdul Rehman @ Haji Ali, Bandu @ Bunty Dagdu Udanshive, Mohammed Afzal @ Afzal Chouda Hayat Qureshi, and Zakir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...