Madras High Court Grants Bail to NDPS Accused Due to Violation of Section 58 BNSS and Article 22(2) — Delay in Remand and Non-Furnishing of Arrest Grounds. Petitioner arrested on 28.12.2023 but remanded on 01.01.2024, beyond 24 hours, entitling him to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 483 BNSS.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, K.K. Roshan Kumar, was arrested on 29.12.2023 for offences under Sections 8(c) read with 22(c), 23(c), 25, 27A, 28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) in connection with the seizure of 11 kg of Methamphetamine from a vehicle in Imphal, Manipur. He was arrayed as A5 in C.C.No.547 of 2024 pending before the I Additional Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act, Chennai. The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). The prosecution case was that on 21.12.2023, based on credible information, the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) searched a house in Redhills, Chennai, and recovered 1.823 kg of Methamphetamine from A2, A3, and A4. Further investigation led to the seizure of 2.978 kg from A1, and subsequently, on 28.12.2023, the petitioner along with two others was intercepted at Keishampat Junction, Imphal, and 11 kg of Methamphetamine was recovered from their vehicle. The petitioner was arrested on 28.12.2023 but was produced before the Magistrate and remanded to judicial custody only on 01.01.2024. The petitioner contended that there was a violation of Section 58 of BNSS and Article 22(2) of the Constitution of India as he was not produced within 24 hours of arrest. He also argued that the grounds of arrest were not furnished and that there was delay in trial. The respondent opposed the bail, citing the commercial quantity of contraband and the petitioner's involvement in a similar case in Guwahati. The court held that the petitioner was secured on 28.12.2023 at 22.00 hours but remanded only on 01.01.2024, which is beyond 24 hours, violating Section 58 BNSS and Article 22(2). The court also noted that the grounds of arrest were not furnished and that the trial had not commenced despite the petitioner being in custody since 01.01.2024. Considering these factors, the court granted bail to the petitioner on certain conditions, including the execution of a personal bond and surety, and reporting to the NCB office daily until further orders.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - NDPS Act - Section 37 NDPS Act, Section 58 BNSS, Article 22(2) Constitution of India - Petitioner arrested on 28.12.2023 but remanded on 01.01.2024, beyond 24 hours - Held that there is violation of Section 58 BNSS and Article 22(2) of the Constitution of India, entitling the petitioner to bail (Paras 3-5).

B) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Delay in Trial - Section 439 Cr.P.C., Section 483 BNSS - Petitioner in custody since 01.01.2024, trial not yet commenced - Held that prolonged incarceration without trial justifies grant of bail (Para 5).

C) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Grounds of Arrest - Section 50 NDPS Act - Grounds of arrest not furnished to petitioner - Held that non-furnishing of grounds of arrest is a violation of constitutional right (Para 3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 483 BNSS, considering the alleged violation of Section 58 BNSS and Article 22(2) of the Constitution of India, and the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the bail petition and ordered the petitioner to be released on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, and on condition that the petitioner report before the NCB office daily at 10:30 a.m. until further orders.

Law Points

  • Bail under NDPS Act
  • Section 37 NDPS Act
  • Section 58 BNSS
  • Article 22(2) Constitution of India
  • Right to be produced before Magistrate within 24 hours
  • Delay in trial
  • Habitual offender
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:1595

Crl.O.P.No.7431 of 2026

2026-04-22

C. Kumarappan

2026:MHC:1595

Mr. S. Kasirajan (for petitioner), Mr. N.P. Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor for Central Government (for respondent)

K.K. Roshan Kumar

Union of India, Represented by its Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai Zonal Unit, Chennai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 483 BNSS for offences under NDPS Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks enlargement on bail in C.C.No.547 of 2024 pending before I Additional NDPS Court, Chennai.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was arrested on 28.12.2023 for possession of 11 kg Methamphetamine and remanded on 01.01.2024, allegedly in violation of Section 58 BNSS and Article 22(2).

Issues

Whether the petitioner's arrest and remand violated Section 58 BNSS and Article 22(2) of the Constitution of India? Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act? Whether the delay in trial and non-furnishing of grounds of arrest justify bail?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Arrested on 28.12.2023 but remanded on 01.01.2024, beyond 24 hours, violating Section 58 BNSS and Article 22(2). Grounds of arrest not furnished. Delay in trial. Respondent: Petitioner was remanded within 24 hours of arrest. Liberal approach not warranted in NDPS cases. Petitioner is a habitual offender with a similar case in Guwahati.

Ratio Decidendi

Violation of Section 58 BNSS and Article 22(2) of the Constitution of India, as the petitioner was not produced before a Magistrate within 24 hours of arrest, entitles the petitioner to bail. Additionally, non-furnishing of grounds of arrest and delay in trial are factors in favor of bail.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner, who was arrested on 29.12.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w Section 22(c), 23(c), 25, 27(A) and 28& 29 of NDPS Act ... seeks bail. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that ... there is violation of Section 58 of BNSS and Article 22(2) of the Constitution of India. The said contention was stoutly opposed by the learned Special Public Prosecutor ...

Procedural History

Petitioner arrested on 28.12.2023, remanded on 01.01.2024. Filed bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 483 BNSS. Heard on 22.04.2026 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 8(c), 22(c), 23(c), 25, 27A, 28, 29, 37, 50, 67
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 439
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 58, 483
  • Constitution of India: Article 22(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Grants Bail to NDPS Accused Due to Violation of Section 58 BNSS and Article 22(2) — Delay in Remand and Non-Furnishing of Arrest Grounds. Petitioner arrested on 28.12.2023 but remanded on 01.01.2024, beyond 24 hours, entitling him...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings in Property Dispute Involving Customary Adoption of Gharjamai. Custom of Gharjamai recognized as valid under local tribal customs, and concurrent findings of fact not interfered with under Article 136.