Search Results for "Mixed Land Use"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Murder of Four Family Members in Brutal Robbery-Murder Case. Court Upholds Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 449, 460, 201 IPC for Killing Two Adults and Two Children in Their Flat.

The case arises from a brutal murder of four members of a family in their flat in Pune. The accused, Bhagwat Bajirao Kale, was a labourer working at a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl - Upholds Conviction Under Sections 376, 302 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and DNA Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl on 5th September 2013. The victim, a student of ITI, was last seen by her mother at Asa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Title and Adverse Possession. Court holds that dismissal of restitution application under Section 144(1) CPC does not bar a fresh suit for possession based on independent title.

The case involves a property dispute over a house and land at Survey No. 123, Block No. 276, village Atyal, taluka Gadhinglaj. The respondents (origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Land Dispute Case. Life imprisonment confirmed for accused Nos. 1 and 8 under Section 302 read with 34 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The case arises from a land dispute leading to the murder of Ashok Parjane. The trial court convicted accused No. 1 Kundalik and accused No. 8 Dhansin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute Cases Due to Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on encroachment and possession were upheld as not perverse under Section 100 of CPC, 1908.

The judgment pertains to two second appeals filed by the same appellant, Pandurang Dharma Gaikwad, against the respondent, Mahamudmuya Ahmadsaheb Pati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Dispute Over Plot Allotment for Hotel Construction. Dispute arose from non-payment of balance lease premium and alleged failure to achieve milestones by CIDCO.

The petitioner, Discovery Properties & Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a...