Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Impleading Third Parties in Civil Suit Challenging Demolition Notices Under MRTP Act. Court Holds That Third Parties Having Direct Interest in Suit Property and Being Affected by Decision Are Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the petitioners before the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane, challenging three notices issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Possession — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata

The applicants (defendants in the suit) filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the trial court's order dated 30.09.2013 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Purchase Declared Ineffective Due to Tenant's Default in Payment of Instalments. MRT's Condonation of Delay Without Proper Opportunity to Oppose Set Aside.

The case involves agricultural lands owned by the petitioners (landlords) which were let out to the deceased respondent no.1 (tenant). The tenant was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Tenancy Dispute Due to Delayed Suo-Motu Inquiry Under Section 84-C of Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Three-Year Delay in Initiating Inquiry Held Unreasonable, Forfeiture Order Quashed.

The petitioner, Appa Dadu Patil, through his power of attorney holder, challenged the orders passed by the Tenancy Avval Karkoon, the Sub-Divisional O...