Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act"

841 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 841 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition in 1960s Case — Section 6 Declaration Issued Within One Year of Section 4 Notification, No Lapse Occurred.

The petitioners, owners of lands in Borla and Deonar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MIDC to Resume Possession of Plots from Company in Liquidation for Non-Payment of Rent. Lease Termination Upheld Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 — Permission Granted Under Section 446 for Resumption of Possession.

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) filed an application seeking permission to resume legal and physical possession of Plots No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Petition, Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Permanent Employment of Contractual Employee. Contractual Appointment with Breaks Does Not Automatically Confer Right to Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by City Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) challenging an order of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Tenants Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Building. Tenants' objections under DCPR 2034 rejected as redevelopment was approved by majority and TAC.

The Bombay High Court dismissed seven writ petitions filed by tenants of a building named 'Haji Manzil' located in Bandra, Mumbai. The building, const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Condition in Housekeeping Contracts. Court holds that condition requiring prior hospital experience for housekeeping work is arbitrary and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Mahalsa Services and Cam Industrial Services challenging a tender condition imposed by the State of Goa ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...