Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

521 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Termination of Traffic Manager Without Domestic Inquiry and Failure to Prove Abandonment Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

28 Sep 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Universal Transport Co., challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which held that they had committed an un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Remand Order in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Maintainability of Complaint Must Be Decided on Merits Without Remand. Relationship of Employer-Employee Must Be Admitted or Undisputed for Complaint Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act to Be Maintainable.

19 Oct 2018

The petitioners, employees of the Forest Department, filed Complaint (ULP) 13/2010 before the Labour Court, Yavatmal, alleging unfair labour practices...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Termination Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai lacks jurisdiction as cause of action arose in Silchar, Assam, and contract clause limiting jurisdiction to Bombay does not apply to industrial disputes under MRTU & PULP Act.

19 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Anil Murlidharan, was employed by M/s. Larsen and Toubro Limited as a Eutectician from 26 July 1995. He was initially posted at Va...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Workman's Right to Advocate in Domestic Enquiry. Management Representative with HR Background and Enquiry Experience Deemed Legally Trained Mind, Justifying Workman's Right to Legal Representation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

3 Feb 2025

The case involves a challenge by the employer, The Indian Express (P) Ltd and its officers, against an order of the Industrial Court at Thane dated 9 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act — Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld. The court held that the Industrial Court correctly declared the first respondent-union as the recognized union, as it had higher membership and the verification was properly conducted.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer’s Writ Petition Against Industrial Court’s Direction to Absorb Employees as Canal Inspectors – Findings of Unfair Labour Practice under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 Upheld. Direction to absorb employees on the post of Canal Inspector from the date of complaint was based on evidence that employees had completed training, passed departmental examination, and were actually performing duties of the higher post, with employer failing to act despite available vacancies.

9 Jan 2006

The writ petition was filed by the State Government and its officers challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, which had declared that the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Transfer Dispute Under MRTU & PULP Act — Issuance of Transfer Order at Mumbai Confers Jurisdiction. Transfer order issued at Mumbai to employee posted in Rajasthan held to confer jurisdiction on Industrial Court at Mumbai under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

19 Sep 2025

The petition was filed by Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, challenging an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai dated 4 May 2022...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order on Permanency and Back Wages in Newspaper Industry Dispute. Industrial Court's finding that previous litigation had determined entitlement to permanency and back wages was upheld, but the High Court held that the Industrial Court had no jurisdiction to grant permanency under the MRTU Act.

12 Mar 2010

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees (Sanjay Shalikram Ingle and others) against M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Private Ltd., chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Industrial Court's Interim Orders Suspending Recognized Union's Rights for Non-Compliance with Section 19(iv) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court held that interim relief cannot be granted without first determining compliance with statutory requirements under Section 19(iv) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

18 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Swarajya Kamgar Sanghtana, a recognized trade union at Exide Industries Ltd., challenged two orders of the Industrial Court, Ahmednaga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Educational Society Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Part-Time Peon. Industrial Court's finding that the employee was performing full-time duties and was entitled to permanency under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 upheld.

13 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Ahmednagar Education Society, challenged an order of the Industrial Court at Ahmednagar dated 18.8.1994, which allowed the complaint f...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)