Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to establish live-link between alleged activities and public order disturbance.

3 Jul 2024

The petitioner challenged a detention order passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA Act) and its subsequent ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Single Offence Against Individual. Single Incident of Assault on Individual Does Not Constitute Threat to Public Order, Detention Order Set Aside.

16 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Gopal Suresh Malik, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 24th August 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Placement of Bail Documents. Failure to place bail applications and orders before the Detaining Authority vitiates subjective satisfaction under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drugs Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

25 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Ramesh Dandekar, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the detention order dated 01.12.202...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Failure to Consider Less Drastic Remedies. Detenu's bail in all three predicate offences and lack of credible material to show disturbance of public order vitiated the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority.

9 Apr 2020

The petitioner, Mukesh @ Mukya Ramesh Desaikar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 31st October 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Bootlegger's Activities Not Shown to Be Prejudicial to Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority failed to produce cogent material to show that the detenu's activities were prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, as distinct from law and order, under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

18 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Dattatray Baswant Jagtap, challenged his preventive detention order dated 11th April 2019 passed under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu Already in Custody at Time of Order. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the likelihood of release on bail when the detenu is in custody; failure to do so renders the detention order invalid.

16 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Shahrukh Yunus Khan, challenged a preventive detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City, on 23 December 2015 unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Detention Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Supply of Verification Statements of In-Camera Witnesses. Failure to Furnish Copies of Verification Statements Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8(b) of MPDA Act, Rendering Detention Invalid.

17 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Rohidas @ Pintya Laxman Gupte, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application. Failure to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention Despite Awareness of Custody Renders Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

27 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Bail Status and Lack of Compelling Necessity for Preventive Detention. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the detenu's bail status and demonstrate a compelling necessity for preventive detention over ordinary law.

30 Jun 2011

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Firoz Khan alias Aabu, challenged a detention order dated 31.12.2010 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Detenu's Judicial Custody and Lack of Bail Possibility. Preventive Detention Order Invalidated as Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated Due to Non-Application of Mind to Custody Status Under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act.

21 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Shahid Hussain Iqbal Shaikh @ Kanya Babu, challenged an order of detention dated 6-9-2004 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)