Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act"

258 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 258 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

10 Jan 2023

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Orders in KVAT Act Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Penalty under Section 53(8) of KVAT Act cannot be imposed without assessment and opportunity of hearing.

3 Apr 2018

The petitioner, M/s B.L. Kashyap & Sons Ltd., a company engaged in civil works contracts, challenged orders dated 8.9.2017 passed by the Joint Commiss...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegetable Fat Spread Held to Fall Under Entry 31 of Third Schedule to KVAT Act, 2003 as Edible Oil. Product 'Vegetable Fat Spread' is not an unscheduled commodity but is covered by Entry 31 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

23 Nov 2016

The appellant, M/s. 3F Industries Ltd., manufactures and markets a product called 'vegetable fat spread'. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes issued ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Sales Tax Case — Re-assessment Not Permissible Under Rectification of Mistake. The Court held that rectification under Section 69 of the KVAT Act cannot be used to re-assess escaped turnover without following the procedure under Section 39.

24 Aug 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Hema Engineering, a dealer registered under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed revision petitions under Section 65(1)...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petition of Dealer in VAT Classification Dispute — 'Nutralite' Held to Be Edible Oil Under Entry 31 of Third Schedule to KVAT Act, 2003. The court quashed the order classifying the product as unscheduled goods, ruling that a fat spread primarily composed of edible oil is taxable as edible oil.

22 Mar 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Pioneer Marketing, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act), deals with a product called 'Nut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision in VAT Limitation Case — Revisional Order Passed Beyond Three-Year Period. Tribunal Correctly Held That Suo Motu Revision Under Section 63-A(3) of KVAT Act Must Be Completed Within Three Years from Date of Assessment Order, Not from Initiation of Proceedings.

26 Aug 2015

The State of Karnataka filed revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) challenging an order of the ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeals Against Revisional Order Under KVAT Act — Remand to Assessing Officer Required. Revisional Authority Under Section 63A Cannot Pass Fresh Assessment Order After Setting Aside Original Assessment; Must Remand to Assessing Officer.

1 Apr 2015

The appellant, M/s Solidus Hi Tech Products Pvt Ltd, a company manufacturing press components, sheet metal enclosures, telecommunication equipments, b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

19 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)