Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — One Time Settlement Not Binding as Bank Did Not Accept Offer. Court Held That Mere Submission of OTS Proposal Does Not Create Binding Contract; Bank's Rejection Valid.

The petitioners, borrowers of the respondent bank, challenged the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bangalore in Diary No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cheque Dishonour Complaints Against Accused Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 dismissed as demand notice was not served at the correct address of the accused.

The judgment pertains to three criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the petitioners (Moodalagiriyapp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition Challenging NCLT Order De-freezing MPID Attached Accounts. MPID Act Overrides IBC for Attachment and Confiscation of Properties of Financial Establishments.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Collector and Competent Authority (NSEL), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Officiating Appointment and Extensions for Chief Electrical Engineer Post. Seniority and Eligibility for Promotion Under Goa Electricity Department Recruitment Rules Examined.

The case involves a challenge by Laxmikant D. Kolvekar, the Chief Electrical Engineer (officiating), against the State of Goa and others regarding the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Termination Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and irreparable injury must be considered for grant of temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The petitioner, M/s. Shyamaraju & Company (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of Indi...