Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act"

395 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 395 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Employer Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Full Back Wages. Termination of Employee Held to be Voluntary Resignation Based on Relieving Letter and Absence of Coercion.

The petitioners, M/s. S.K.International (a partnership firm) and its partner Chirag Kenia, challenged an Award dated 12 July 2022 passed by the Labour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Subsistence Allowance Payment. Subsistence Allowance Payable Only During Suspension Period, Not After Dismissal Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Pravi Auto Swing Pvt Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 21-3-2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Quashing Extension of Retirement Age. Certifying Officer Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 Exceeded Jurisdiction by Modifying Retirement Age Without Proper Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Foundation Brake Kamgar Sanghatna, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 26th February 2016 passed by the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Mill Challenging Order to Grant Permanency to Re-employed Clerks. Voluntary Retirement Does Not Bar Claim for Permanency for Subsequent Continuous Service Under Industrial Law.

The petitioner, Shree Ram Mills Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which allowed a complaint filed by the respondent union,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension Order in Disciplinary Proceeding Due to Non-Compliance with Standing Orders. Employer Failed to Follow Mandatory Procedure Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 Before Placing Employee Under Suspension.

The petitioner, Deepak Narayan Joshi, was employed by Hindustan Organic Chemicals Limited (Respondent No.1) as a Chemical Operator since 1.7.1987 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Termination Upheld as Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service. Labour Court's Finding of Fact Not Perverse, No Interference Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Keru Kisan Rokade, was initially appointed on a temporary basis by the respondent, Geoffery Manners & Co. Ltd., Nasik. Although his ap...