Madras High Court Decides Second Appeal in Property Dispute among Legal Heirs under Section 100 CPC. First Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree Questioned on Substantial Questions of Law.
14 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Heritage property"
200 result(s) found
Found 200 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BBMP Appeal Against Single Judge Order Directing Regularisation of Unauthorised Construction Under Section 321 of KMC Act. Contempt Petition Closed as Compliance Achieved During Pendency of Appeal.
15 Oct 2025The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) against an order dated 29.05.2024 passed by a learned Single J...
- 101
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Guarantor's Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order for Non-Compliance with Pre-Deposit Condition Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act. Petitioner failed to deposit 50% of the debt due as mandated by Section 18(1) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, leading to dismissal of appeal and writ petition.
20 Feb 2025The petitioner, Kailasam P, was a guarantor for a loan of Rs.12,84,46,406.76 as quantified on 04.04.2017. The Karnataka Bank Ltd. initiated recovery p...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Rent Control Subletting Case — Tenancy Terminated Under Section 16(1)(e) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court upheld the Appellate Bench's finding that the tenant had sublet the premises to persons who were not family members, and that the earlier judgment regarding adoption did not create res judicata.
5 Jul 2024The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the defendants (applicants) challenging the judgment and order dated 1 November 2023 passed by...
- 612
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.
8 May 2023The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...
- 188
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Height Restrictions Near Naval Air Station — No Violation of Right to Development Found. Height restrictions imposed under Section 9A of the Aircraft Act, 1934 and Rule 44 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 for safety of aircraft operations are reasonable and not arbitrary.
9 Dec 2022The petitioners, Vikram Delite Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Shree Ramkrishn Enterprises, and Parikshit Miglani, filed a writ petition under Arti...
- 88
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Jun 2022This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...
- 286
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Interplay Between Sections 14A of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 109 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 in Layout Approval Dispute
25 Nov 2021This matter concerns a writ petition filed by a House Building Co-operative Society against the Mandya Urban Development Authority (MUDA) and the Stat...
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows PIL Seeking Remedial Measures Against Illegal Sand Mining and Withdraws Environment Clearance for Non-Compliance. Court Directs State to Formulate Comprehensive Policy and GSEIAA to Re-evaluate Clearance Under Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines.
18 Dec 2019The Federation of Rainbow Warriors, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Hig...
- 145
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.
24 Mar 2017The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...
