Search Results for "Deepak Kumar"

956 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 956 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Compliance with Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act and Bar of Res Judicata. Suit by unregistered partnership firm held not maintainable; subsequent suit for same cause of action without withdrawing earlier suit also barred.

The plaintiff, Jayesh Pandya, a real estate broker, conducted business under the name 'Pandya & Shah Associates', which was an unregistered partnershi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Sessions Case for Abetment of Suicide and Outraging Modesty Due to Lack of Proximate Link Between Alleged Acts and Suicide. Suicide Note Not Attributed to Applicant; No Evidence of Instigation or Intent Under Section 306 IPC.

The applicant, Pravin Solanke, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0109/2017 d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Examines Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC — Judgment Incomplete. Accused's Extra-Judicial Confession to Social Worker and Circumstantial Evidence Assessed Without Final Determination.

The appeal arose from a sessions trial where the accused, a practising lawyer, was convicted under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners unless there is ouster or denial of title.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of joint family properties. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts Under MRTU Act for Employees Outside Maharashtra. The Court considers whether the principle that situs of employee determines jurisdiction (GlaxoSmithKline) is overruled by subsequent Supreme Court rulings.

The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters, including Appeal No.585 of 2009 and several writ petitions, involving employees and trade unions fr...