Search Results for "Dead Body Identification"

835 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 835 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence, Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC based on circumstantial evidence and last seen theory.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, in Sessions Case No. 27 of 2005. Criminal Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Ramkishan @ Pintya s/o Asaram Kayande and Ramprasad @ Nana Dattatraya Janjal, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Jalna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal of Accused Convicted Under Section 302 IPC Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Set Aside as Motive, Last Seen, Recovery Evidence and Dog Tracking Held Unreliable, Failing to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances Pointing to Guilt.

This appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, a 24-year-old villager, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2011

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Shailendrakumar Satyanarayan Thakur, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, on 25th October 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 201 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The appellants, Jafar Khijar Sheikh and Sumit Appa @ Prakash Gawali, were convicted by the District Judge-10 and Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Santosh Balu Mali, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife Suman, under Sections 302, 201, and 498-A of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. The court held that the failure of the appellants to explain the death of the deceased after being last seen together led to an inference of guilt under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.

The appellants, Santosh Tanbaji Durge and Raju @ Rajesh Vasanta Gudapwar, were convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 364, 302, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Not Complete to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 392 read with Section 34 of IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Sawantwadi dated 24 January 1997 acquitting the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302, 364, 342 IPC.

The case arises from an incident registered as C.R. No.76 of 2005, involving the murder of a person. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.1069 of 2006...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeals in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC, Examining Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Appellants Challenge Reliability of Recovery and Chain of Custody, Arguing Investigation Delays Vitiate Conviction.

The case arose from a violent incident on 19.1.2011 in Timki Mochipura, Nagpur, where Dinesh Shendekar was killed and his brother Deva and another per...