Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Grants Leave and Examines High Court's Interpretation of Section 3...
Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court Order Impleading Purchasers ...

Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"

542 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 542 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Compliance with BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme and Quashes Pre-deposit Order in Customs Dispute. Merger of Sick Company with Petitioner Under SICA Extinguishes Pre-deposit Liability, and Revenue Authorities Are Bound by the BIFR Scheme.

7 Jan 2026

The petitioner, SMS Lifesciences India Limited, filed two writ petitions. The first sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 (Director G...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court's Landmark Decision on Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944: Bharat Petroleum vs. Commissioner of Central Excise" "Defining Transaction Value in the Sale of Petroleum Products Between Public Sector Undertakings Under the Central Excise Act."

20 Jan 2025

The judgment clarifies the determination of "transaction value" under Section 4(1) of the Central Excise Act for sales made between public sector oil ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

12 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs FRRO to Issue Exit Permit to Acquitted Chinese National in Gold Smuggling Case — Customs Department's Opposition Held Unjustified. The court held that the mere intention to challenge an acquittal does not justify preventing an acquitted person from leaving the country.

11 Jul 2024

The petitioner, a Chinese national, arrived in India on a flight from Beijing that was diverted to Mumbai due to bad weather. Upon arrival, customs of...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Modvat Credit Case — Captive Power Plant Erection Eligible for Credit Under Rule 57Q(6) of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Substantial questions of law answered in favor of assessee regarding eligibility of credit on capital goods used in erection of captive power plant by other divisions of the same group.

14 Jan 2022

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which upheld the Commiss...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. CESTAT's finding that the assessee had reversed CENVAT credit before removal of inputs as waste and scrap was a pure finding of fact not open to challenge under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

25 Jul 2018

The Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax) filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 35-G of Central Excise Act, 1944. CESTAT Orders Not Appealable to High Court as They Do Not Involve Questions of Law.

23 Nov 2017

The Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs filed two appeals under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against orders of the Customs, Excis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Customs Refund. Petitioner entitled to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 from the date of expiry of three months from the date of receipt of the refund order.

16 Sep 2016

The Petitioner, Shelf Drilling International Inc. (formerly Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc.), filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Interest Liability for Provisional Assessment. Section 11DD of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable to differential duty determined on finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

7 Oct 2014

The appellant, Godrej Industries Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of Liquid Hair Dye during the period from September 1982 to March 1985. The d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty on Mosquito Coils Classified as Insecticides — Unjust Enrichment Defence Rejected. Product Held to Be Insecticide by CEGAT and Supreme Court; Duty Paid Under Protest and Burden Not Passed on to Consumers, Hence Refund Cannot Be Denied Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

20 Jul 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Bombay Chemicals Limited and its Managing Director, held a Central Excise Registration for manufacturing 'Toys, Brand Mosquito C...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)