Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

331 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue Appeals and Allows Assessee Appeals in Customs and Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of goods under Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff determined based on technical literature and expert opinion, rejecting revenue's reclassification.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise and by M/s Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd. The core i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Intermediate Product Marketability. Court holds that CESTAT failed to consider relevant evidence regarding marketability of loosely assembled fibre web used captively for manufacture of exempted jute carpets.

The appellant, M/s Hitkari Hitech Fibres Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturer of products under Chapters 56 and 57 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeals in DEPB Overvaluation Case — Finds No Evidence of Overvaluation or Fraud. Revenue's reliance on market enquiry and statements of third parties insufficient to prove that exported automobile parts were overvalued for DEPB benefits under Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant, M/s Advance Netways Marketing Pvt. Ltd., was an exporter of automobile parts such as door bidding, fuel pump fitting, front suspension ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Adjudication Order for Lack of Compliance with Section 138B; Directs Petitioners to Avail Alternate Remedy. Failure to Avail Opportunity for Cross-examination Precludes Exercise of Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

The petitioners, engaged in import of goods such as rechargeable torches and LED lights, were issued show cause notices by the Directorate of Revenue ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case Against SEBI. Regulatory fees collected under SEBI Act, 1992 are statutory levies, not consideration for taxable service under Finance Act, 1994.

The Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai East, filed an appeal under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the orde...