Search Results for "Bombay Housing and Area Development Board"

438 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging MCZMA's Refusal of CRZ Clearance for Occupancy Certificate. MCZMA cannot refuse clearance on ground of mismatch between DCR 1991 and DCR 1967 when construction was lawfully permitted under DCR 1991.

The petitioner, MRK Enterprises, a partnership firm, owned a property known as 'Amir House' at Colaba, Mumbai. The petitioner sought a Coastal Zone Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Housing Board Dispute — Unauthorized Construction Not Ipso Facto Nuisance but Concurrent Findings Upheld. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Despite Section 71 Bar of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 as Suit Pertains to Private Rights.

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant No.1, Sau. Smita Mohod, against concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Exemption Case. Assessee Held Eligible for Exemption Under Section 10(20A) as Development Authority and Business Commenced in Relevant Year.

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Playground to Trust for School Construction. Lease of Public Land for Educational Purpose Held Valid as Playground Not Reserved as Recreational Ground in Development Plan.

The petitioners, residents of Oshiwara and Lokhandwala area of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on 13/08/2012 challenging the lease of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Minister's Order Directing Grant of TDR in Lieu of Reservation. Landowners Entitled to Transferable Development Rights Under MRTP Act After Finalization of Town Planning Scheme.

The judgment involves two writ petitions: one by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Corporation) challenging the order of the Minister for U...