Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

21677 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21677 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Letters of Administration in Succession Dispute — No Grounds for Revocation Under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Concealment of Material Facts Not Established; Court Had Jurisdiction as Deceased's Fixed Place of Abode Was in Mumbai.

The petitioner, Kamal Prasad, filed a petition under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking revocation of Letters of Administration g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Determines Factual Enquiry Whether Share Transfer Resulted in Members Exceeding Fifty. Enquiry Directed by Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014 Following Dispute Over Validity of Pre-emption Rights in Articles of Association.

The appeal was placed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay following a remand order by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Temple Pooja Rights Dispute. Appeals under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC challenge trial court's order restraining interference with hereditary archakas' rights at Shree Mahabaleshwara Temple.

The miscellaneous first appeals arose from a common order dated 2020-02-19 passed in Original Suit No. 2 of 2016 by the Principal District and Session...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time for Arbitration in Infrastructure Dispute Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Grants Six Months Extension for Completion of Pending Arbitration Proceedings with Consent of Both Parties.

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation...