Search Results for "Annual Capacity Determination"

225 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging DGP Appointment in Punjab, Upholds UPSC Selection Process. Appointment Valid as Empanelment Followed Supreme Court Directions in Prakash Singh Case and Draft Guidelines, with No Proven Bias or Arbitrariness.

The dispute arose from the appointment of Mr. Dinkar Gupta as Director General of Police (Head of Police Force) for Punjab in 2019, challenged by appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Leave to Sue Under Section 92 CPC for Public Trust Dispute. Section 52 of Maharashtra Public Trust Act Bars Application of Sections 92 and 93 CPC to Public Trusts.

The petitioners, members of Mahad Taluka Maratha Seva Sangh, a trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 and the Societies Registr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Gratuity Dispute — Trust Deed and Scheme Capped Gratuity at Statutory Limit Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employer's Gratuity Scheme Did Not Abandon Statutory Ceiling; Employee Entitled Only to Statutory Maximum.

The appeal arose from a dispute between BCH Electric Limited (appellant-employer) and Pradeep Mehra (respondent-employee) regarding the quantum of gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Central Excise Duty Demand and Penalty. Petitioner failed to show any jurisdictional error or perversity in concurrent findings of fact regarding duty demand and penalty under Central Excise Rules.

The petitioner, M/s. Mandovi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at ...