Search Results for "Action Ispat case"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Action Ispat case"

175 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 175 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Complaint for Non-Compliance with BNSS Section 223 Procedure. Mandatory hearing of accused at cognizance stage under first proviso to Section 223 BNSS applies to complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

28 Apr 2025

The petitioner, Ashok S/o Siddappa Bankar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Company Affairs. Directors Not Vicariously Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averment of Their Responsibility at Time of Cheque Issuance.

23 Feb 2023

The applicants, Mukund Ajay Kumar Choudhary, Kapil Ajay Kumar Choudhary, and Ajay Kumar Choudhary, were directors of CLC Industries Ltd., the accused ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Company Affairs. Directors Not Vicariously Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Being in Charge of and Responsible for Conduct of Business at Time of Offence.

23 Feb 2023

The case involves an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by three directors (applicants) of CLC Industries Ltd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Price Escalation Dispute. Interpretation of price escalation clause by arbitral tribunal found patently illegal as it ignored the contractual formula, leading to setting aside of award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Aug 2022

The case involves a challenge under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against a judgment dated 31st March 2017 passed by a lear...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition on Interest on Refund Under Goa VAT Act — Interest Payable from Date of Assessment Order Determining Refund. Section 33(2) of the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 mandates interest from the date the amount became refundable, which is the date of the assessment order, not the date of actual refund.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, United Spirits Ltd. (formerly McDowell and Co. Ltd.), a registered dealer under the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005, filed returns for t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Government's Withdrawal of Mining Lease Recommendation for Violation of Natural Justice. Prior Approval Under Section 5(1) of MMDR Act, 1957 Cannot Be Revoked Without Hearing the Applicant.

11 Sep 2019

The petitioner, D. Ramesh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a letter dated 04.01.2017 issued by the St...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Prohibit Export of Sand Under MMDR Act - Gujarat Rules Restricting Inter-State Sand Movement Held Valid. The Court held that the prohibition on export of sand was a reasonable restriction under Article 304(b) of the Constitution, aimed at preventing illegal mining and conserving natural resources.

1 Mar 2019

The case involves appeals by the State of Gujarat against the Gujarat High Court's judgment striking down Rules that prohibited the export of ordinary...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Leave to Defend Application Not a First Statement on Substance of Dispute. Filing of application for leave to defend under Order 37 CPC does not constitute submission of first statement on substance of dispute, and application under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed before written statement is within time.

9 Apr 2018

The appellant, Haier Telecom (India) Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in a summary suit filed by the respondent, Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd., fo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Price Revision Upheld as Valid Modification. Letter dated 28 June 1999 held to have modified the terms of the Purchase Order, allowing recoveries and adjustments per letter dated 31 October 2000.

13 Dec 2012

The petitioner, M/s. JCL International Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., on 1 May 1999 for the sup...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Vessel Maintenance Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Patent Illegality. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation that the respondent was not liable for pre-existing HOTO defects, as the contract did not impose such liability.

18 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 2nd April, 2008 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)