Search Results for "2016 Rules"

6413 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6413 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Civil Appeal Against High Court's Interference Under Article 227 Constitution of India - High Court's order setting aside trial court's decision to set aside ex parte decree was quashed as unjustified interference in discretionary order under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The dispute arose from a civil suit for recovery of money filed by the respondent against the appellant. The appellant contested the suit, but during ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Termination During Probation Valid Without Stigma or Mala Fides. Probationer has no right to the post and termination simpliciter during probation does not attract principles of natural justice.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by probationary employees of the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd (MSETCL) chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Enquiry Officer's Report Not Furnished to Contractor Before Imposing Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by Respondent No.2, Oil and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Cognizance in Bihar Excise Case — Private Vehicle Not a Public Place Under Section 53(a) of Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. Consumption of liquor in a private vehicle does not constitute an offence under Section 53(a) as the vehicle is not a 'public place' under the Act.

The appellants, all Rotarians, were travelling from Giridih, Jharkhand to Patna, Bihar in a private vehicle to attend a Rotary Club meeting on 25.06.2...