Search Results for "1894"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "1894"

1742 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1742 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State and Development Corporation in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute - High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Set Aside for Reconsideration.

11 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court addressed a group of appeals filed by the Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited and the State ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Petitions for Katkari Tribe Members Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Held That Landowners Are Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Section 26(1)(b) and Solatium Under Section 30(1) of the Act, and That the Acquisition Proceedings Were Not Vitiated by Non-Compliance with Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

11 Jan 2024

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by members of the Katkari Scheduled Tribe and other landowners challenging the compensation awarde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Allowing Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Appeal. Dispute Regarding Apportionment of Compensation Must be Adjudicated Under Section 30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Not Through Impleadment in Appeal Challenging Enhancement Quantum.

23 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from the acquisition of land by the State Government under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellant, the original landowne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. The court held that failure to acquire reserved land within the statutory period results in automatic lapsing of reservation and release of land to the owner.

17 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Siddharam Shivappa Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Non-Compliance with Award or Possession Requirements.

9 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Ramchandra Jamnadas Sadriwala, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court seeking a declaration that the land acquisition pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications under Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 on Grounds of Non-Compliance with LARR Act, 2013. Petitioners Alleged That Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and That Procedural Irregularities Vitiated the Notifications.

20 Dec 2017

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Jalna, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications for Tourism Project — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as No Personal Right or Public Interest Established.

5 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Arjun Mahadev Harmalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement for Agricultural Land Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in not granting statutory benefits under Section 23(1A) and Section 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and that the acquired land was agricultural, not non-agricultural, entitling the claimants to higher compensation.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse When Possession Has Been Taken, Following Constitution Bench Ruling in Indore Development Authority That Interprets 'Or' as 'Nor' or 'And' in Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

13 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi and others against a judgment of the Delhi High Court. The High Court had allowed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)