High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad heard multiple second appeals arising from civil disputes. Specific legal issues, findings, and operative directions are not mentioned in the available text.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "second petition maintainability"
1857 result(s) found
Found 1857 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Communication Barring No-Confidence Motion Against Koppal Zilla Panchayat President. Right to Move No-Confidence Motion Under Section 180 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is Asserted as an Inherent Constitutional Right, Not Dependent on Separate Rules.
27 Aug 2020The writ petitions were filed by elected members of the Koppal Zilla Panchayat challenging communications from the State of Karnataka and the Regional...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder and Robbery Case — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Recovery of Weapon and Stolen Articles Not Attributed to Petitioners. Petitioners Accused of Murder and Robbery Under Sections 302, 392, 120B, 201 IPC Granted Regular Bail Under Section 483 BNSS, 2023.
25 Jul 2025The petitioners, accused nos. 1 and 2 in S.C.No.9/2025 pending before the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, arising...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Bank Auction — Bid Below Reserve Price and Without Earnest Money Rejected. Auction Sale Confirmed in Favor of Highest Bidder Despite Petitioner's Claim of Irregularity.
10 Jan 2011The Petitioner, Goldie Sud, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the public auction conducted by Punjab Na...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application in Review Petition — Delay of 89 Days Not Sufficiently Explained, Limitation Period for Review Not Extended by Supreme Court's Liberty. The court held that pursuing a Special Leave Petition does not constitute sufficient cause for delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the liberty granted by the Supreme Court does not extend the limitation period for filing a review.
25 Apr 2019The applicants, who were not parties to the original suit, had filed a Second Appeal (No. 21/2018) which was dismissed as not maintainable by the Bomb...
- 110
High Court
High Court Dismisses PIL in Land Reservation Lapse Case Under MRTP Act Due to Automatic Statutory Lapse and Revised Development Plan. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi as Grievance Was Private Interest, and Municipal Council's Inaction After Purchase Notice Led to Deemed Lapse Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, With New Plan Safeguarding Public Amenities.
9 Mar 2026The dispute originated as a Public Interest Litigation filed in 2017 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging a...
- 960
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Reject Plaint in Suit for Conveyance and Amenities. Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Claim for Conveyance is Continuing Cause of Action Not Barred by Limitation.
28 Jan 2021The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicants (defendants in the suit) challenging the order of the learned Senior Civil Judg...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration in Commercial Suit — Arbitration Agreement Not Duly Signed by Plaintiff. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires existence of valid arbitration agreement; mere reference in invoices insufficient.
8 Jul 2025The petitioner, M/s. Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit (Com. O.S. No.207/2024) before the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions ...
- 51
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes CIC Order Holding Deemed University Not a 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act — Right to Information Act, 2005 Not Applicable to Deemed Universities Established Under UGC Act, 1956
3 Nov 2015The petitioner, Manipal University, a deemed university declared under Section 3 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956, challenged an order da...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards Reinstating Employees Terminated Without Inquiry. Termination Without Domestic Inquiry Held Illegal Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
11 Aug 2015The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by the employer, Maharashtra Krushi Udyog Vikas Mahamandal Ltd., challenging the awards of the L...
- 157
