Search Results for "employee"

7274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Officer in Disciplinary Proceedings for Reckless Lending and Negligent Compromise of Securities. Non-furnishing of Investigation Report Did Not Prejudice Defence as Charges Were Based on Clear Evidence and Admission.

The appellant, Sri M R Nagarajan, a former Branch Manager of Syndicate Bank (later merged with Canara Bank), was subjected to a disciplinary enquiry o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds CAT Order Directing NIMHANS to Grant Child Care Leave to Employee. Child Care Leave is a Statutory Right Under Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972 and Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily.

The petitioner, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), challenged an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal Order in Trap Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Petitioner Reinstated with Back Wages as Disciplinary Proceedings Based on Unsubstantiated Trap and Non-Examination of Key Witnesses Violated Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sri M.S. Kadkol, was a government employee who was dismissed from service based on a trap case. The trap was laid on a complaint dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals by Zilla Panchayat in Workmen's Compensation Cases — Employer-Employee Relationship Not Established. Commissioner's Award Set Aside as Claimants Failed to Prove That Deceased Were Employees of Zilla Panchayat Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Chief Secretary of Zilla Panchayat, Belgaum, under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Claimants' Cross-Objections Dismissed as Deceased Pedestrian Was Crossing Highway Without Caution, Contributing 50% to Accident.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of a deceased 25-year-old bachelor who died in a road accident involving a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Lack of Documentary Evidence. Claimant entitled to compensation as driver under Section 30(1) of Workmen Compensation Act, 1923.

The appellant, Sri Siddeswara, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Daily Wagers Against Recovery of Excess Salary. Recovery Order Quashed as Arbitrary Under Article 226 of Constitution of India for Payments Made Under Government Resolution Without Misrepresentation.

The petitioners, nine daily wagers employed with the respondent State of Gujarat, challenged a recovery order dated 04/02/2013 (No.113 of 2013) seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Revision of Pay Scale and Higher Pay Scales for Deceased Employee. Court Directs Correction of Last Pay Certificate and Quashes Recovery Orders in Service Law Dispute.

The present petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Sarojben, widow of Late Bharatkumar Labhshanker Jani, seeking various...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Claim of No Direct Employment. Commissioner's Award of Rs.5,65,065 with 12% Interest and 50% Penalty Upheld Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The present appeal was filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, by the appellant, who was the employer before the learned Workm...