Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1603 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1603 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Recall of Annulment Order in Insolvency Case Due to Concealment of Creditor. Appellant Insolvent Failed to Disclose Kotak Mahindra Bank as Creditor with DRT Recovery Certificate, Leading to Recall of Annulment Under Section 22(1) of Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

31 Mar 2021

The case involves an appeal filed by Akshay D. Thakkar (the Appellant/Insolvent) against an order dated 18th September, 2018 passed by a learned Singl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interlocutory Orders, Upholding Minimal Judicial Intervention in Arbitration. Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked to challenge procedural orders during ongoing arbitration proceedings.

25 Mar 2019

The petitioner, M/s Space Wood Office Solution Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two interlo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions for Enforcement of Foreign Awards Due to Non-Compliance with Section 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Failure to Produce Original or Certified Copies of Arbitration Agreement and Award Renders Petitions Not Maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed by Armada (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. against Ashapura Minechem Ltd. seeking enforcement of foreign aw...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit Under Order 37 CPC — Deposit of 50% of Suit Claim with Interest Upheld as Reasonable Condition. Court holds that while granting leave to defend, the trial court must balance the interests of both parties and can impose conditions to secure the plaintiff's claim, but such conditions must not be arbitrary or excessive.

10 Oct 2014

The case involves two petitions arising from an order dated 30.03.2013 passed by the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, in O.S.No.8306/2012...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application in Contract Dispute Over Scope of Arbitrable Issues. Court holds that disputes relating to interpretation and application of contract provisions are arbitrable, and the arbitrator can decide his own jurisdiction under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Mar 2012

The applicant, Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Infrastructure Dispute Over Concession Agreement — State's Objection on Limitation Rejected as Arbitrability Question for Tribunal. The court held that the issue of limitation is a matter for the arbitrator to decide under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a BOT project.

19 Sep 2017

The applicant, Kakade Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appoin...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Rigid Frame Columns Are Steel Structurals Classifiable Under Section 14(iv)(v) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule Entry C-55(v) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court examines the classification of pre-fabricated building components and the interpretation of 'steel structurals' in commercial parlance.

23 Dec 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Transport Contract Dispute — State's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days Triggers Court's Power Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Jul 2021

The applicant, Prakash Askram Jain, entered into a transport agreement with the Governor of Maharashtra on 30/03/2001 for transporting food grains and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Refer Suit to Arbitration Due to Inseparable Cause of Action and Non-Arbitrable Issues. Trial Court's order upheld as suit involved multiple defendants not party to arbitration agreement and issues not arbitrable.

16 Mar 2006

The appellant, Bombay Isle Developers Pvt. Ltd., the original Defendant No.1, appealed against the order of the City Civil Judge dated 2nd March 2006 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Impleadment of Alleged Successor Company in Execution of Foreign Award — Piercing Corporate Veil Justified to Prevent Fraudulent Evasion of Liability. The court held that where a company is created to evade existing liabilities, the corporate veil can be pierced and the new entity can be impleaded in execution proceedings under Order 21 Rule 50 CPC.

29 Sep 2016

The appeal arose from a judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 5 October 2015 in Chamber Summons (L) No.444 of 2015 in Judges Order No.212 of 2014...

155 156 157 158 159

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)