Search Results for "Res Integra"

1664 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1664 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeals Against Company Law Board's Investigation Order Under Section 237(b)(i) of Companies Act, 1956. Appeals challenge the order directing investigation into the affairs of companies allegedly linked to Ketan Parekh in the 2001 stock scam.

The judgment pertains to 14 appeals filed by various companies alleged to be controlled by Ketan Parekh, the central figure in the 2001 stock market s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Scope of Order XLI Rule 22 CPC in Second Appeal. Conditional Readiness to Perform Contract Held Not Sufficient; Respondent Cannot Challenge Adverse Finding Without Cross-Objection.

The case originated from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 17 August 1973 concerning immovable property. The plaintiff, V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dissents That Designated Court Under MCOC Act Cannot Order Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Without Prior Sanction. Special Court Not a Magistrate and Section 23(1) Bar Overrides Private Complaint Procedure.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions involving a common legal question: whether a designated court under the Maharashtra Control of O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Suit for Recovery of Port Trust Dues Under Major Port Trust Act, 1963. The Court Considered the Liability of an Importer, a Canalising Agent, and a Shipper for Wharfage and Demurrage Charges After Goods Remained Uncleared for Years and Were Auctioned.

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, a statutory corporation under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963, filed Suit No. 1533 of 1985 before the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders of Petitioner in Indian Telegraph Act Case Due to Absence of Public Emergency or Interest of Public Safety. The Court Held That Telephone Interception Without Proper Statutory Compliance Violates Right to Privacy and Intercepted Material Must Be Destroyed.

The petitioner, a businessman, challenged three orders dated 29 October 2009, 18 December 2009, and 24 February 2010, by which his telephone calls wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Land Acquisition under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 for Non-Compliance with Prior Notice Requirement under Section 13. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice as Ex-Parte Award Passed Without Proper Service of Notices and Without Following Section 17(5).

The High Court of Bombay heard two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land and a struc...