Search Results for "tribunal's jurisdiction"

8846 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8846 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Company Law Board's Power to Direct Issue of Shares Under Section 111 of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal raises the question whether the Board can order issuance of share certificates and rectification of register absent valid transfer documents.

This company appeal arose from an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 14 January 2013 in Company Petition No. 23 of 2012. The CLB had directed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Service Tax Levy on Irrigation Restoration Charges Paid to State Government. State's Collection of Charges for Water Diversion is a Sovereign Function, Not a Taxable Service Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Rattan India Power Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Mining Lease Revision Challenge. Revisional Order Passed by Central Government Tribunal at Delhi Does Not Confer Jurisdiction on Nagpur Bench Despite Property Location in Maharashtra.

The petitioner, Vidarbha Mining Association, a registered partnership firm with its registered office at Nagpur, filed a writ petition under Articles ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Cooperative Bank Dispute — Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction Due to Absence of Fraud Allegations. Jurisdictional bar under Cooperative Societies Act upheld as plaint lacked particulars of fraud.

The appellants, Durga Premanand Navelkar and Premanand Ganesh Prabhu Navelkar, filed a suit against the Goa Urban Co-operative Bank Limited and its of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Banking Ombudsman Award for Wrongful Debit Despite Stop Payment Instructions. Bank's Liability Upheld as Limitation Period Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme 1995 is Directory, Not Mandatory.

The case involves a dispute between Canara Bank (the petitioner) and Shri Uttam Rathod (respondent no.1), a proprietor of M/s. Rishi Impex, who held a...