Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

22597 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22597 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case Concerning Termination of Temporary Workers. Termination Held Not Retrenchment, Falling Under Section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act as Employment Was Under Fixed-Term Contracts.

26 Oct 2016

The writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Industrial Court's order dated 23.12.1999 which confirmed the Labour Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing Deletion of Parties in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Misjoinder of Parties and Causes of Action Not Established. The court held that the presence of defendants 6 to 8 was necessary for complete adjudication of the dispute relating to partnership property and family settlement under Order I Rule 10 CPC.

25 Oct 2013

The petitioners, defendants 1 to 4 in Special Civil Suit No. 2 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order dated 18 April 2012,...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.955 OF 2018

2 May 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in MFA No. 4257 of 2026 Filed by Actor Darshan Challenging Dismissal of Injunction Against Release of Film 'BOSS' - Impact on Fair Trial and Personality Rights Considered. Appeal arises from trial court order dated 02.06.2026 dismissing application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC in OS No. 2151/2026.

17 Jul 2026

Background: The appeal arose from a suit filed by film actor Darshan Srinivas and his wife against Siri Productions and others, seeking a permanent in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Guidelines on Arrest and Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act. Directions Requiring Preliminary Enquiry and Approval for Arrest Quashed as Legislative Overreach, but Anticipatory Bail Direction Upheld.

1 Oct 2019

The Union of India filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 20.3.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.416 of 2018, which had issued gu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement Denied Due to Lack of Evidence. Claimants Failed to Produce Comparable Sales Evidence Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement for Agricultural Land Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in not granting statutory benefits under Section 23(1A) and Section 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and that the acquired land was agricultural, not non-agricultural, entitling the claimants to higher compensation.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to Gross Delay and Laches. Petitioner's failure to establish tenancy and inordinate delay in challenging notifications under Land Acquisition Act bars relief.

5 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Vinayak Bhaskar Sinai Dhume, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging notifications dated 7th April 1999 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Transaction Dispute — No Perversity or Wednesbury Unreasonableness Found. The Court held that a new argument not raised before the arbitrator or in Section 34 proceedings cannot be raised for the first time in a Section 37 appeal.

15 Apr 2024

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by SATCO Capital Markets Ltd. against Rahul H Bajaj....

154 155 156 157 158

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)