Search Results for "estate land"

2340 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2340 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Quashing of Criminal Proceedings for Offences of Forgery and Cheating in Property Dispute; Private Complaint Alleged to Mirror Civil Suit for Possession

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, dealt with a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Held Sham and Not Intended to Be Acted Upon. Evidence Act Sections 91 and 92 Do Not Bar Proof of Sham Transaction; Subsequent Purchasers Are Bona Fide Purchasers Without Notice.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 7th December 1981 executed by the first defendant in favour of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Time Was Essence of Contract; Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld. Breach by Buyer in Agreements to Sell Land in Gurgaon Leads to Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance and Refund of Earnest Money.

The case involves a dispute over two agreements to sell agricultural land in Gurgaon, executed on 17.02.2004, between the appellants (sellers) and the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute Over Title to Property — Decree of Specific Performance Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The appellant, The Pashmina Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, challenging the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Slum Rehabilitation Tenement Dispute. Court holds that Trial Court erred in not considering balance of convenience and irreparable loss while rejecting injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellants, Fayzan Khan, Devendra Mishra, Firoz Ismail Khan, and Rajesh Kanojiya, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Dindoshi seeking a decla...