Search Results for "tendering evidence"

459 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 459 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree of Specific Performance of Sale Agreement. Court holds that plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform is established by evidence of payment of balance sale consideration and execution of sale deed within time.

The present first appeal is filed by the defendant under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Employee in Tender Tampering Case — Reinstatement Set Aside. The Court held that in cases of serious misconduct like tampering with tender documents, the punishment of dismissal is proportionate and interference by the High Court under Article 226 is unwarranted.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Patna High Court which set aside the dismissal of the respondent, Ajit Kumar Singh, an employee of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of BHEL Engineer Trainee for Demanding Illegal Gratification. Disciplinary proceedings validly conducted; no violation of natural justice or proportionality in penalty of removal for demanding bribe for placement of purchase order.

The petitioner, Umesh Eknath Agalawe, was employed as an Engineer Trainee with Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL). Disciplinary proceedings were ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — Agreement of Sale Not Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance. Court held that an agreement of sale does not require stamp duty as a conveyance under Article 5(e) of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and impounding with penalty was improper.

The petitioner, Mr. R. Mahendra Kumar Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25.11.2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...