Search Results for "summons trial procedure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "summons trial procedure"

2168 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2168 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Anticipatory Bail Orders in Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) Prosecution Under Companies Act, 2013. The High Court erred in granting anticipatory bail as Section 212(6) of the Companies Act, 2013, bars application of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the accused's evasion of warrants in economic offences involving large-scale fraud justified strict approach.

9 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of sixteen appeals arising from criminal proceedings initiated by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) a...

High Court

Division Bench of Bombay High Court Hears Appeals from Single Judge Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit. Ex-Parte Decree Passed in Diamond Supply Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC After Defendants Failed to Comply with Conditional Deposit Order.

27 Feb 2017

The dispute arose from a summary suit filed by Sailam BVBA, a Belgian partnership firm, against Helios Jewellery Pvt Ltd (Defendant No.1) and its four...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings on Ex Parte Decree. Tenant Failed to Establish Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

21 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Sakuma Finvest Pvt. Ltd., was the tenant of the respondent, Chemox Exports Imports Pvt. Ltd. The landlord filed RAE Suit No.1398/3081 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition to Discard Wife's Affidavit Evidence in Maintenance Proceedings Under Section 125 CrPC. Affidavit of evidence filed under Order 18 Rule 4 CPC is valid evidence and cannot be discarded merely because it was filed by the wife in a maintenance case.

5 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Anil Ambashankar Joshi, husband of the respondent Reena Anil Joshi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Factories Act Case for Lack of Factual Details in Complaint. Magistrate's order taking cognizance set aside as complaint under Section 92 of Factories Act, 1948 did not disclose time, date, place or manner of alleged offence, rendering it unsustainable.

14 Feb 2014

The petitioners, who were the Managing Director, Director, and Joint Managing Director of M/s Waterways Shipyard Pvt. Ltd., filed a Criminal Writ Peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Common Question of Law in Consolidated Commercial Suits and Interim Applications. The Court Interprets Provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 in the Context of Multiple Suits Involving Banking, Media, and Other Commercial Disputes.

27 Feb 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment Application in Partition Suit. Amendment Sought After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Due to Lack of Due Diligence.

22 Dec 2018

The petitioners, Hemlata Harish Bhatia and Bharat Vallabhdas Bhatia, filed a suit for partition in 2004 against the respondents, Vallabhdas Lalchand D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Probate Case, Upholds Setting Aside of Ex Parte Decree Dismissing Caveat Due to Non-Service of Citation. The court held that the son of the testator was not served with citation, and the ex parte decree was rightly set aside subject to payment of costs.

12 Jan 2010

The appellant, R.V. Bhasin, filed a probate petition (Petition No. 4 of 2003) in the Bombay High Court seeking probate of the Will and Codicil of his ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Transposition of Defendants as Plaintiffs in Abated Suit — Order I Rule 10 CPC Cannot Be Used to Circumvent Abatement Under Order XXII CPC. The court held that after the suit abated due to the death of the sole plaintiff, only her legal representatives could apply to set aside abatement, and defendants who were not legal representatives could not be transposed as plaintiffs.

4 Mar 2013

The case arises from a suit filed in 1993 by two plaintiffs, Sitabai and Mathurabai, seeking declarations regarding the invalidity of certain Release ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in FERA Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Opportunity Notice and Violation of Speedy Trial. The Court quashed criminal complaints and summoning orders against Standard Chartered Bank and its officer for offences under FERA, holding that the proviso to Section 61(2) of FERA requires a mandatory opportunity notice before prosecution, and that inordinate delay of over 20 years violated Article 21.

21 Jul 2026

The case involves appeals by Standard Chartered Bank and its officer against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which declined to quash two crimin...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)