Search Results for "substantial question of law"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "substantial question of law"

991 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 991 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wakf Board's Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Dargah and Graveyard. Court Holds That Wakf Board Can Sue for Declaration and Possession Without Prior Notification Under Section 6 of Wakf Act, 1954, and That Adverse Possession Cannot Be Claimed Against Wakf Property.

26 Feb 2016

The appellant, Maratwada Wakf Board, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment of the fir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Part in Recovery of Possession Case — Appellant Not a Tenant, No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The appellate court's order granting entire damages without separate inquiry under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC set aside, trial court's direction for inquiry restored.

17 Feb 2016

The appellant, Rajendra Suryakant More, was a former employee of the respondent company, M/s Fixolite Wires & Cables Pvt. Ltd. He was provided with a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Case Due to Hearsay Evidence and Inconsistent Pleadings. Power of Attorney Holder's Testimony Based on Information from Father Held Inadmissible, and Decree for Injunction Cannot Be Granted When Plaintiff Failed to Prove Part of the Property.

5 Feb 2016

The case involves a second appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa arising from a property dispute. The appellants (defendants) challenged the j...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell and Possessory Receipts Established Plaintiff's Continuous Readiness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

4 Feb 2016

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original defendant against a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts. Agreement to Sell Dated 1st October 1974 Proved; Appellant as Subsequent Purchaser Not Protected Under Section 19(b) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

29 Jan 2016

The case involves a second appeal filed by Sadashiv Ramchandra Arve (original defendant no.3) against the judgment and decree dated 2nd December 1992 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where findings are based on appreciation of evidence and no perversity is shown.

11 Dec 2015

The judgment pertains to two second appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a property dispute. The appella...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Cooperative Society Entitled to Deduction Under Section 80P(2)(e) on Ginning and Pressing Charges. Reopening of Assessment Based on Change of Opinion Not Justified.

8 Dec 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which upheld the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Admission in Cross-Examination Sufficient to Prove Title. Court holds that an admission by the defendant in cross-examination regarding the plaintiff's ownership can be relied upon to decree the suit, even if the plaintiff's own evidence is weak.

3 Dec 2015

The appellants (original defendants) filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree of the Principal District Judge, which had confirmed the tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The court held that the appellants failed to prove their title and possession over the suit property, and the findings of fact by the lower appellate court were not perverse or based on no evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two second appeals filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, South Goa, Margao, in Regular Civi...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below on Title and Possession. The court held that the appellant failed to prove title and possession over the suit property, and the findings of fact by the lower appellate court were not perverse or based on no evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a property dispute where the appellant, Xec Mohidin (since deceased, represented by his heirs), filed a second appeal against the ju...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)