Search Results for "standing committee chairman"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Direct Designation as Senior Advocate — Power Vests Exclusively in Full Court Under Indira Jaising Guidelines. Petitioner's Claim for Direct Conferment of Senior Advocate Designation Rejected as Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, a lawyer enrolled with the Bar Council of Chhattisgarh since 2013, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Bar Council of Mah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in MCGM Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days of Notice Entities Applicant to Court-Appointed Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Kalpataru Projects International Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Workman and Tribunal's Order in Industrial Dispute; Outcome Not Specified

The workman, employed as an Accountant since 1995 and later promoted, was an active union member. On 25.11.2013, a strike notice under Section 22(1)(B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Third Party's Writ Petition Seeking Cancellation of Caste Certificate Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, not being the certificate holder or a statutory authority, cannot challenge the caste certificate of another under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Narayan V. Shiroor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...