COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 350 OF 2017
28 Jan 2020The case concerns two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14 February ...
Search Results for "specific findings"
7375 result(s) found
Found 7375 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Concurrent findings of default in payment of rent and subletting without consent upheld under Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Order 20 Rule 12 CPC.
30 Apr 2019The petitioners, Orbit Super Market Private Limited and the legal heirs of Dr. Shrikant Jichkar, challenged concurrent orders of the trial court and a...
- 143
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Refusal to Grant Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell Land. Trial Court Had Awarded Money Decree for Rs. 50,000 and Rs. 17,00,000 with Interest but Dismissed Claim for Specific Performance; Validity of Subsequent Sale Deed to Third Party Also in Issue.
5 Aug 2010The appellant, M/s. Primella Sanitary Products Pvt. Ltd., filed a civil suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 4 September 1985 against r...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.
9 Jan 2024The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Society's Petition, Quashes Revision Order Against Re-Audit Report Under Section 81(6) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Re-audit report is a mere opinion, not a decision or order, and revision under Section 154 is not maintainable.
4 Feb 2025The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions arising from a dispute concerning the re-audit of a cooperative society registered under the Mahar...
- 1147
High Court
Madras High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Upholds Arbitral Award Except for Claim No.6. Post-Contractual Changes in Pipeline Alignment and Scope Reduction Lead to Dispute Over Additional Costs and Delay.
9 Jun 2026The appellant, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, invited tenders for construction of a Permeate Conveyance Pipeline as part of a p...
- 159
High Court
Bombay High Court Division Bench Reviews Section 34 Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award on Electricity, Price Variation, and Excavation Claims. The Single Judge found the Arbitral Tribunal excluded vital letters and contract clauses under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, warranting the Section 37 appeal.
22 Jul 2025The appeal arose from an arbitral award concerning a construction contract for a railway tunnel. Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd, a Government of India...
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.9189 of 2010
5 May 2011The matter arose out of a dispute over the setting up of a new private sugar factory. Khandoba Prasanna Sakhar Karkhana Limited and Sahyadri Sahakari ...
- 70
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat Order in Banking Fraud Compensation Claim — Jurisdiction of Permanent Lok Adalat Under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Raised Due to Alleged Criminal Misconduct by Third Parties. The dispute involved unauthorised online transfers from a bank account enabled by a duplicate SIM issued without consent, leading to claims for compensation and questions on the Lok Adalat's adjudicatory powers in fraud cases.
1 Jun 2026The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging the order of the Perm...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Appellants Entitled to Possession of Suit Property Based on Title and Adverse Possession. Permissive occupation does not create ownership; respondent failed to prove adverse possession or valid title.
24 Sep 2014The case involves a dispute over possession of a suit plot and house. The original plaintiffs (now appellants) are the sons of Marotrao Dhobale, the o...
- 150
