Search Results for "shop demolition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "shop demolition"

193 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 193 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cellular Company's Petition Against Panchayat Orders for Demolition of Telecom Tower. Held that a mobile phone tower is not a 'building' under Section 135 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, and the Panchayat lacked jurisdiction to require prior permission or order removal.

5 May 2005

The petitioner, Bharti Cellular Ltd., a cellular service provider, installed a mobile phone tower on the terrace of a building in Navelim, Goa. The Vi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.

7 Jun 2006

The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO Plot Allotments — Allegations of Fictitious Societies Grabbing Plots at Fixed Rates. The validity of allocations under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and CIDCO Regulations depends on the genuineness of the housing societies.

23 Nov 2005

The Public Interest Litigation was instituted by Public Concern for Governance Trust, a registered charitable trust, against the State of Maharashtra,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Dispute — Landlord Estopped from Denying Tenancy After Accepting Status and Giving Undertaking for Alternate Accommodation. Principle of Estoppel Under Section 116 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Applied to Prevent Landlord from Resiling from Earlier Admissions.

10 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Pius Bonaventure Fernandes, was a tenant of residential premises in 'Gorden House', Mumbai, owned by Manu Narang (predecessor of respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.

7 Sep 2016

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute Over Lease and Possession — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Title and Adverse Possession. The court held that the appellants failed to prove adverse possession and that the lower appellate court's findings were not perverse, thus no interference under Section 100 CPC.

21 Aug 2013

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute over two plots of land in survey no.7 and survey no.6 at Nanded. The Nanded Sachk...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement/MoU and Deed of Assignment Due to Lack of Privity of Contract and Non-Compliance with Stamp Act. The court held that a third party cannot enforce a contract to which it is not a party, and that unregistered and insufficiently stamped documents cannot be admitted in evidence.

6 May 2016

The plaintiff, Excel Enterprises, a partnership firm, filed a suit seeking a declaration that there is a valid and binding Agreement/MoU dated 28th Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Rejecting Plaint in Property Suit — Limitation Period for Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Is Six Months from Date of Dispossession, Not from Date of Knowledge. Plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC based on disputed facts regarding possession.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Ganpat Shankar Chougule, filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court seeking possession of a property under Section 6 of the Specific R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Approval as Abuse of Process. Court finds lack of bonafides and imposes costs of Rs. 5,00,000 for misuse of public interest litigation jurisdiction.

27 Sep 2022

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sarthi Seva Sangh and another petitioner, challenging the approval of an a...

13 14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)