Search Results for "setting aside consent terms"

3482 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3482 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree — Remands for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Trial Court's Failure to Consider Sufficient Cause Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC Constitutes Failure to Exercise Jurisdiction.

The appeal arises from an order dated 15 November 2021 passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay, rejecting Notice of Motion No.3946 of 2019 filed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging AGRC Order Upholding Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Dispute between two groups of slum dwellers over choice of developer; court upholds AGRC's decision based on consent and merits.

The petitioners, New Jagruti Co-operative Housing Society Limited (Proposed) and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Apex Griev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court of Bombay: Commercial Arbitration Appeal" "Exploring the scope of judicial review under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, addressing readiness, willingness, and compensation issues in a shareholder dispute."

Arbitration Scope: The Court clarified the restrictive jurisdiction under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing minim...