Search Results for "scientific examination"

842 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 842 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Rape and Murder. Appeal Challenges Conviction Under Sections 376 and 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The appeal arises from the judgment of conviction dated 08.11.2017 by the VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, in Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Brutal Rape and Murder of Two-Year-Old Child. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Testimony Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 363, 376, 377 IPC.

The case involves the brutal kidnapping, rape, unnatural offence, and murder of a two-year-old girl by the appellant, Ravi S/o Ashok Ghumare, in Jalna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 396 IPC; Raises Issues of Illegal Detention and Defective Investigation. Accused Contended Recovery Was Tainted and Circumstantial Evidence Unreliable.

The High Court of Karnataka heard four criminal appeals filed by accused Nos.2 to 5 against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 27.01.2012/0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 120(B), 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeals were filed by accused No.1 (Harish) and accused No.3 (Lokesh @ Sathish) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 25.04.2017 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Judgment on Appeals Against Conviction in S.C.No.122/2015; Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Challenged by Accused.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, considered three criminal appeals filed by convicted accused Nos. 1 to 3 against the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeals Against Acquittal of Three Accused in Murder Case Under IPC. Charges Involve Conspiracy, Murder, and Destruction of Evidence; Appellant Challenges Trial Court's Acquittal.

The matter involved two criminal appeals preferred against the judgment of acquittal rendered by the Fast Track Court-I, Bengaluru in S.C. No.489/2004...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 IPC and 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Paramesha, was convicted by the Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Hassan in Special Case No.146/2014 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Second Appeal Against Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts in Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession. Dispute Involves Validity of Registered Will and Claim of Daughter as Class I Heir Over Ancestral Properties.

The dispute concerns an original suit for declaration of title and possession of agricultural and residential properties. The plaintiff claimed to be ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajratan Sahebrao Nawghare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.10/2013 for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence Under IPC. Conviction by Trial Court for Offences Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Challenged on Grounds of Inadequate Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive.

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial Court in S.C.No.58/2013 dated 21.11.2016, whereby ...