Search Results for "regional provident fund commissioner"

223 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 223 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Gratuity Payment Despite Departmental Enquiry — Forfeiture of Gratuity Requires Specific Finding of Quantified Loss. Employer Cannot Forfeit Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Without Specific Charge and Finding of Quantified Loss.

The petitioner, Vinod Vinayak Jinturkar, a former employee of the Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation (respondent no.2), filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Stay of Departmental Enquiry During Criminal Trial in EPF Fraud Case. Held that departmental proceedings and criminal trial can proceed simultaneously as charges are distinct and no prejudice is caused to the delinquent employee.

The petitioner, Shiva Shankar Mamidi, a Data Processing Assistant in the Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), challenged an interim order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Dispute: Patna High Court Had Territorial Jurisdiction to Entertain Writ Petition Challenging Stoppage of Pension. Part of Cause of Action Arose Where Pension Was Received and Stopped, Not Where Employment Was Served.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Patna High Court dismissing a Letters Patent Appeal against a Single Judge's order that had dismissed a writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Petition Against Rejection of Discharge Application in NA Land Permission Case; Arguments Presented. Petitioner claims immunity as Judge under Judges Protection Act and Section 77 IPC for granting NA permissions under Goa, Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code.

The petitioner, a Secretary (Finance) in the administration of Daman & Diu, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, was given additional charge of Collector in 1993. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Dismissed Employee's Entitlement to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Dismissal Constitutes 'Retirement' Under Section 2(q) and Forfeiture Requires Specific Order Under Section 4(6) — Employee Entitled to Gratuity Despite Dismissal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Chairman cum Managing Director of Western Coalfields Ltd. challenging the entitlement of respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court considers legality of State interference in recruitment by an autonomous technical institute. The dispute centers on the scope of autonomy under Government Resolutions and the power of the Board of Governors to make appointments without State oversight.

The College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP), established in 1854, is a premier technical institute. In 2002, under the Technical Education Quality Improve...