Search Results for "public buildings"

1594 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1594 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 13-B of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for NRI Landlords in Chandigarh and Punjab. Constitutional validity of provision granting immediate possession to Non-Resident Indians upheld as reasonable classification under Article 14.

The appeals were filed by tenants challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow of Ex-Serviceman Property Tax Exemption Under Government Resolution. Petitioner entitled to exemption from all forms of property tax under MMC Act and other cesses as per Government Resolution dated 5th April 2016 read with Corrigendum dated 7th April 2016.

The petitioner, Supriya Rajesh Nair, a widow of an ex-serviceman, filed a writ petition seeking exemption from payment of property tax and other cesse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010000842011_1

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Appellate Court's Order in Redevelopment Dispute. Interim Relief Granted for Possession of Flats in Ready Building Despite Opposition from Some Members.

The writ petition was filed by a cooperative housing society ('Godi Kamgar Griha Sanstha Ltd.') and its developer ('Bharat Infrastructure & Engineerin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Gram Panchayat's Property Tax Levy on Industrial Units in KIADB Area — Property Tax Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Is Valid Despite KIADB Land Ownership.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various industrial units located in the Sompura Industrial Area, developed by the Karnataka I...