Search Results for "protection home"

2022 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2022 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Compromise Between Husband and Wife. Proceedings under Sections 498A, 420 IPC and Sections 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 quashed as continuation would be an abuse of process of law.

The petitioner-husband filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of criminal proceedings in C.C.No.24483/2018 arising from Crime No.112...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Superintendent of Women's Protection Home in SC/ST Act Case Over Sexual Exploitation Allegations. High Court's Bail Order Set Aside for Violating Victim's Right to Hearing Under Section 15A(3) of SC/ST Act and Ignoring Gravity of Offences.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the victim against a Patna High Court order granting bail to respondent No.2, a former superintendent of a wome...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Bail Petitions and Refers Questions on POCSO Act to Division Bench. Single Judge observes conflicting views on Section 35 compliance and refers issues regarding default bail and evidence recording under Section 164 Cr.P.C., doubting Vinay v. State of Karnataka.

The case involved two criminal petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court by the accused, Hanumantha Mogaveera, seeking bail under Section 439 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Father in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 354, 323 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajay Dhengre, was convicted by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal Case No.48/2016 for offences...